Prediction of Naim Lalji vs Charles Crisp Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
N. Lalji vs C. Crisp

Naim Lalji

GBR

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Charles Crisp

GBR

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Lalji 1 - 0 Crisp

They have played 2 sets in total, with Naim Lalji winning 2 and Charles Crisp winning 0. The last match between Naim Lalji and Charles Crisp was at the LTA Shrewsbury Challenger - Shrewsbury, 20-11-2006, Round: Q1, Surface: Acrylic, with Naim Lalji getting the victory 6-4 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Lalji	1
Crisp	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(Q1) LTA Shrewsbury Challenger - Shrewsbury(11-20-06)

Stats

Naim Lalji

Charles Crisp

N. Lalji vs C. Crisp H2H Profile

N. Lalji	Stats	C. Crisp
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
25.64% (20-58)	Career Total W/L	0.00% (0-13)
1	Indoor	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

N. Lalji vs C. Crisp Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Naim Lalji has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Charles Crisp has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Naim Lalji, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Charles Crisp has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Naim Lalji has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Charles Crisp has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Naim Lalji has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Charles Crisp winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Naim Lalji has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 29% (W/L 2/5), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 3/12). Charles Crisp has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 29% (W/L 0/7), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
Player level: In the last year, Naim Lalji has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Charles Crisp has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Naim Lalji winning 1 times and Charles Crisp being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Naim Lalji winning 2 and Charles Crisp winning 0.
The last match between Naim Lalji and Charles Crisp was at the LTA Shrewsbury Challenger - Shrewsbury, 20-11-2006, Round: Q1, Surface: Acrylic, with Naim Lalji getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Naim Lalji has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Charles Crisp has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Naim Lalji has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Charles Crisp has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Naim Lalji has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Charles Crisp has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Naim Lalji vs Charles Crisp Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

N. Lalji vs C. Crisp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

N. Lalji	Stats	C. Crisp
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	7
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

N. Lalji Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
LTA Shrewsbury Challenger - Shrewsbury - 20-11-2006
Q1 Charles CrispC. Crisp	W	6-4 6-3	Stats
Q2 Frederik NielsenF. Nielsen	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
The LTA Nottingham Challenger - Nottingham - 23-10-2006
Q1 Pavol CervenakP. Cervenak	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Great Britain F11 - 31-07-2006
R1 Joshua GoodallJ. Goodall	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Great Britain F10 - 17-07-2006
R2 Enrico IannuzziE. Iannuzzi	L	6-3 6-4	Stats

View All

C. Crisp Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
The LTA Hester Trophy - Manchester - 16-07-2007
Q1 Luke BourgeoisL. Bourgeois	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
The Surbiton Trophy - Surbiton - 04-06-2007
Q1 Jamie DelgadoJ. Delgado	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
LTA Cardiff Challenger - Cardiff - 16-04-2007
Q1 Igor ZelenayI. Zelenay	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
LTA Shrewsbury Challenger - Shrewsbury - 20-11-2006
Q1 Naim LaljiN. Lalji	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
The LTA Nottingham Challenger - Nottingham - 23-10-2006
Q1 Kamil CapkovicK. Capkovic	L	6-2 6-1	Stats

View All

N. Lalji vs C. Crisp Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

N. Lalji	Stats	C. Crisp
25.64% (20/58)	YTD Win/Loss	0.00% (0/13)
30.00% (51/119)	Sets Win/Loss	0.00% (0/26)
40.82% (634/919)	Games Win/Loss	26.98% (58/157)
28.57% (2/5)	Hard Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
22.22% (2/7)	Clay Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
27.66% (13/34)	Indoor Hard W/L	0.00% (0/6)
20.00% (3/12)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/7)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
304.51	Average Opponent Rank	295.23
0.00% (0/2)	Main Tour W/L	0.00% (0/1)
27.78% (5/13)	Challenger W/L	0.00% (0/12)
25.86% (15/43)	Futures W/L	0% (0/0)
25% (19/76)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	0% (0/13)
65% (11/17)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
25% (4/16)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/0)
78% (23/18)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
22% (23/5)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
4% (55/2)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (13/0)